Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am
Bader v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am
Bader v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 8:30 am
By way of background, in Kyana Jinks, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:03 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:03 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Shah v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:45 am
The court relied on Middleship Township v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
In Reading Area Water Authority v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
However, Bailey - and specifically Justice Scalia's concurrence - calls the SJC's ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:27 pm
Commonwealth (501 S.E.2d 438), the Court of Appeals cited Powers v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
The issue is the potential abuse of power and the Commonwealth needs to prove that a roadblock was constitutional. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
The issue is the potential abuse of power and the Commonwealth needs to prove that a roadblock was constitutional. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 3:45 am
First, the Commonwealth Executive enjoys a power to acquire property unencumbered by the requirements of just terms (see Johnston Fear and Kigham & The Offset Printing Co v Commonwealth (1943) 67 CLR 314); although this seems to be limited to national emergencies and some would argue that this intervention is in response to a national emergency) or wartime (see Clunies Ross v Commonwealth (1984) 155 CLR 193 per Gibbs CJ,… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:53 pm
That case is Grafton v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In Haaland v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:00 pm
Sebelius] Before the current pandemic, I had never read the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 3:25 pm
In Bruesewitz v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
In Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
