Search for: "Reagan v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2008, 6:50 am
The Great Turnback of grants and regulatory discretion to the states was a product of two former governors -- Reagan and Clinton -- with such notable (or infamous, if you are so inclined) measures as TANF, expansion of section 1115 Medicaid waivers, Lopez/Morrison/Gonzales v Oregon judicial vindication of state power, etc. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
“In determining the existence of diversity jurisdiction, a corporation is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
That is the threat posed by state power in our century. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am
In an effort to appeal to non-Democratic voters, Doug Elmets, a Republican and member of the Reagan administration, channeled Senator Lloyd Bentsen’s famous debate retort, stating: “I knew Ronald Reagan; I worked for Ronald Reagan; Donald Trump, you are no Ronald Reagan” Perhaps the biggest surprise hit of the evening was Khizr Khan’s speech about the patriotism of American Muslims. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 11:10 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
There are countless examples of this, but perhaps the best illustration is Cavazos v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
A few months later the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Furman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 2:15 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Icon at Panorama, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm
On January 29, 2019, in Procopio v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:53 am
Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
The article responds to an argument between New York Times columnists David Brooks and Paul Krugman over the racial meaning of "states' rights," a term that Reagan used in the speech he gave at the fair. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
In Collins v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Both observed that DOMA is constitutionally infirm to the extent that it reflects a bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group, an interest deemed impermissible in Romer v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
