Search for: "Rule v. Simon" Results 321 - 340 of 1,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2009, 9:56 pm
The IPKat continues to receive correspondence concerning Case C-181/09 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD, a reference for a preliminary ruling on European trade mark law from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) which the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) declared to be "manifestly inadmissible". [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
He issued 41 rulings between 1951 and 1962 in litigation known as Bush v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
The panel of experts (Kate O’rourke Mbe Senior Counsel, Charles Russell Speechlys; Simon Gray Partner, Tomkins; Simon Malynicz Qc Barrister, 3 New Square; Dominic Farnsworth Partner, Lewis Silkin) considered such questions as: Where are we now? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Whitney Cooney discusses the cert denial in Severson v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
” In the end, I could not have had a more supportive and kinder team than Alice’s team at Simon & Schuster. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
— Michael Graetz & Linda Greenhouse (2016) Question: How did your manuscript find its way to Simon & Schuster and to its famed executive editor Robert Bender? [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:38 am by Dan Bressler
” “In his well-respected treatise, Simon’s New York Rules of Professional Conducted Annotated (‘Simon’), Prof. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:25 pm by Eric E. Johnson
Minneapolis courthouse (on left) where Moore v. [read post]