Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 321 - 340
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
# # #DECISIONSouth Shore D'Lites LLC v First Class Prods. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:10 pm
Joshua D. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Solicitors Regulation Authority v Davis and another [2011] WLR (D) 36 “Where a solicitor admitted disciplinary charges, and therefore anticipated sanctions upon him, he should give notice in advance of the hearing to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that he intended to contend either that no order for costs should be made against him, in exercise of the tribunal’s power under section 47(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974,… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Salazar (D. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
Wilkinson, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2009 WL 2591157 (D. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:19 am
Supp. 2d 1164 (D. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 12:49 am
Supp. 2d 1164 (D. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:25 pm
(Kesner v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 1:40 pm
(…) People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm
R&D’s expert, Dr. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 9:41 am
HLB Kidsons (a firm) v Lloyd's Underwriters subscribing to Policy 621/ PKID00101 and others; [2008] WLR (D) 344 “Where a professional indemnity insurance policy required the insured to notify to the insurers of any potential claims against the insured ‘as soon as practicable’ the insured could satisfy the policy requirement if he made an attempted notification of circumstances which might give rise to a claim for professional negligence,… [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:45 pm
D. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:49 am
AB and others v Ministry of Defence [2009] EWHC 1225 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 174 “In relation to a group action the issue as to when a claimant had "knowledge" for the purposes of ss 12 and 14 of the Limitation Act 1980 was primarily one of fact The state of the claimant's belief was to [...] [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:14 am
Regina v NW [2010] EWCA Crim 404; [2010] WLR (D) 62 “The words ‘present together’ in the expression ‘Where three or more persons who are present together’ in s 2(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 denoted no more than that the persons concerned were in the same place at the same time. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:57 am
Regina v Neish [2010] EWCA Crim 1011; [2010] WLR (D) 116 “The process whereby a judge gave instructions to the court listing office to relist the hearing of confiscation proceedings amounted to a postponement of the proceedings by the court of its own motion and was a valid postponement for the purposes of s 14 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:47 am
Regina v Dunn [2010] EWCA Crim 1823; [2010] WLR (D) 207 “The fact that an appeal from the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division only lay to the Supreme Court if the Court of Appeal certified that a point of law of general public importance was involved in its decision did not amount to a denial of the essence of an appellant’s right of access to the Supreme Court and was not incompatible with articles 6 and 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
Regina v Lancaster [2010] EWCA Crim 370; [2010] WLR (D) 63 “Where a person was charged with an offence of falsifying a document made or required for an accounting purpose, by omitting a material particular from that document, contrary to s 17 of the Theft Act 1968, the omitted particular was to be regarded as material if it had the effect that the document was liable to mislead in a way which was significant, or in a way which mattered. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Regina v Miller [2010] EWCA Crim 1153; [2010] WLR (D) 142 “In criminal proceedings, the circumstances in which one party would be permitted pursuant to s 100(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to ask a witness a question in cross-examination with a view to eliciting an answer implicating that witness in bad behaviour, which behaviour that party would be otherwise unable to prove, were infrequent and limited in scope. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:49 am
Regina v Braithwaite [2010] EWCA Crim 1082; [2010] WLR (D) 141 “Material contained in police crime reports that unproven allegations had been made against a person who was someone other than a defendant, or that that person had been investigated in respect of an offence, would rarely be of substantial probative value to an issue at trial sufficient to render it admissible as evidence of bad character against that person pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice… [read post]
