Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. E. W." Results 321 - 340 of 363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
., 2014[26]2013165Pomegranate arils (frozen)Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, WisconsinTurkeyUnknownCollier et al., 2014[27]; CDC 2013[28]2016143Strawberries (frozen)Arkansas, California, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Virginia, West Virginia, WisconsinEgyptUnknownCDC 2016[29]Estimates of the annual costs (direct and indirect) of hepatitis A in the United States have ranged… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm by Keith Kanouse
However, the Franchisee agrees to sign the Franchisor's renewal franchise agreement, even if materially different from this Agreement, if the new franchise agreement was collectively negotiated and approved by 50% of the franchisees in the system. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
My guess, incidentally, is that if a state supreme court wanted to appoint a lawyer to brief and argue this sort of case pro bono (see, e.g., this example from New Jersey) — especially when the case is on an interesting issue and has a relatively compact record — it should have no difficulty finding someone willing to take on such a task, given that a state supreme court argument is usually seen as interesting and prestigious. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Revenues may rise if property values do, or if new property is placed into service, but under rate caps, local government officials are limited in their ability to engineer a conscious tax increase. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
An unintentional experiment in automobile insurance in New Jersey and Pennsylvania illustrates the point. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am by Schachtman
  Thus, “[w]e commonly use the language of probability or likelihood when we talk about the credibility or warrant of a claim-about how likely is it, given this evidence, that the claim is true, or, unconditionally, about how probable the claim is. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Thus “[w]e do not believe comment k was intended to provide nor should it provide all ethical drugs with blanket immunity from strict liability design defect claims. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]