Search for: "STATE v. LOPEZ"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 6:49 pm
Estate of Andy Lopez 17-1354 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
Estate of Andy Lopez, 17-1354. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:42 am
The court also rejected the defendants’ procedural challenge to her state-law wage claim (Lopez v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:24 pm
The First Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:59 am
—Texarkana 1998, no pet.); Lopez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 17-6721, Gutierrez-Lopez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
Posted by Vishal Gupta, Sandra Mortal, and Xiaohu Guo (University of Alabama), on Saturday, April 21, 2018 Tags: Compensation ratios, Diversity, Executive Compensation, Management Corporate Governance Deviance Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:13 am
“About two weeks after that legal victory in Hamdan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:08 pm
” Lopez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Lopez, No. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:50 am
” Gordon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
Gustafson’s most high-profile litigation matter is her representation of the plaintiff in Young v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 11:30 am
" (internal citation omitted)); Lopez v. [read post]
