Search for: "Sanders v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action alleging defamation failed because the challenged statements were absolutely privileged as a matter of law and cannot be the basis for a defamation action (see Ifantides v Wisniewski, 181 AD3d at 576; Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d at 1021; Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d at 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734 [2014]; Rabiea v Stein, 69 AD3d at 701). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:29 pm
The oral argument in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:39 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" This was stated in the 1937, Texas Supreme Court case, Universal Life & Accident Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Likewise, the allegations of defamation failed to state a cause of action. [read post]