Search for: "Save Benefits Inc. v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
On March 4, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a Class Action Settlement in In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities Litigation, No. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
 After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am by Editors
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am by Editors
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
Devas also entrusted its related US company, Devas Multimedia America Inc., with collecting debts arising from the ICC award. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Of course you have, if you’re in the United States (or New Zealand — the rest of the modern world bans the practice). [read post]