Search for: "Scott v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 2,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 9:49 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a dispute over whether a district judge, when resentencing a defendant after remand, must follow the sentencing findings issued by the original sentencing judge. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
utm_term=.e26cdbdc081bOf interest to patent people, Taney was in the dissenting four in Winans v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 12:59 pm
"The problem in this case... is a reluctance to accept what the Supreme Court of the United States resolved. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 3:45 am
Extremely interesting case from the 11th Circuit today, United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:28 am by Daniel Cappetta
United States, 456 F.3d 278, 290 (1st Cir. 2006), the First Circuit Court of Appeals analyzed a motion for a new trial in the context of government misconduct. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:15 pm by Unknown
Big Man (Tribal Courts; Tribal Codes; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:01 am by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an initial case management conference in Continental v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm by Steven Boutwell
By Scott Huffstetler Today, the United States Supreme Court decided to consider three decisions involving class-action waivers in employee arbitration agreements. [read post]