Search for: "Short v. Hill"
Results 321 - 340
of 965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2022, 4:37 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
Those aren't California-based, which is where most of the venture capital action in the U.S. is (Sand Hill Road). [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 5:18 am
I recommend it highly.Judge Hagler was also the author of the decision in Inwood Hill Med. v Allstate Ins. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:52 am
Taxpayer contends, however, that the SCOV’s decision in Chapin Hill Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:52 am
Taxpayer contends, however, that the SCOV’s decision in Chapin Hill Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Realizing its error, the Court attempted to correct itself a short two years later, but probably only managed to make things worse, in Feldman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In Hill v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Vera and Shaw v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
To overturn this, there must be legal evidence of guilt, carrying home a decree of conviction short only absolute certainty. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
See Hill v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
Hill delivered the decision.Link: http://tinyurl.com/yaq4yhc . [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:27 am
This morning, the CRTC issued its much-anticipated ruling in the CAIP v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:06 am
Young, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
This case is actually pretty much a redux the Steinberg v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
See Marchand v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:23 pm
And now the Third Circuit has issued its third case entitled Prometheus Radio Project v. [read post]
