Search for: "Smith v. District of Columbia"
Results 321 - 340
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 18-5232, Smith v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
The district court held that E.M.D. had failed to prove the exemption applied by “clear and convincing evidence,” and the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
District of Columbia – which became Heller in the Supreme Court – were African American women. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
That's three.And, perhaps reflecting its federal roots, the highest court in the District of Columbia has applied Twombly/Iqbal pleading standards several times, in Murray v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The implications of the decision, which clarified the application of articles 8 and 10 of the Convention to determine the propriety of such powers, extend to the recently enforced Investigatory Powers Act 2018, as noted by the Cyberleagle Blog, Press Gazette and Graham Smith via INFORRM. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
For example, jumping the White House’s fence would be a violation of the District of Columbia’s trespass statute, which subjects jumpers to up to six months in jail. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
Since the Justices’ ruling in 2008 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:26 am
Roberts, 263 N.C. 336, 139 S.E.2d 593 (1965) and Smith v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Ft. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia to the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit blocked that in a 2008 ruling. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
Harlow v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Rahimi, set to be argued before the Supreme Court on November 7, to sidestep the controlling "text and history" interpretative methodology described in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Appeal from the 241st Judicial District Court, Smith County, Texas.Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, has ruled in Klayman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
These cases should be decided in favor of a straightforward application of the constitutional test for addressing challenges to "arms ban" laws set forth in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
Box 1358 Hot Springs, AR 71902 Phone: (501) 624-4411 (V/TDD) Fax: (501) 624-019 DISABILITY ORGANIZATIONS ADAPT Arkansas ADAPT Leonard Boyle Phone: (501) 565-8495 Verlon McKay Phone: (501) 568-1887 Fax: (501) 821-4087 AIDS Arkansas AIDS Foundation P.O. [read post]
