Search for: "Smith v. Smith State Prison" Results 321 - 340 of 1,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm by Cindy Cohn and Hanni Fakhoury
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am by John Elwood
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
Concepcion, and Smith v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
If he thinks the prison at Guantanamo still has a role in national security or that it provides some benefit to the United States, I welcome his views. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
The only way one can claim privacy grounds is if the state constitution or some statute supports the argument because the Fourth Amendment won't under Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Brownstein, Constitutional Myopia: The Supreme Court's Blindness to Religious Liberty and Religious Equality Values in Town of Greece v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to decide whether a state prison inmate may seek access to DNA evidence for use in pursuing a claim of innocence, by filing a civil rights claim after his trial is over. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
Smith, The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform, 25 Hofstra L. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
If a prisoner is threatened with death at gunpoint during an interrogation, is it not "rational" for that prisoner to say what he or she thinks the interrogator wants to hear? [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am by Lindsay F. Wiley, Steve Vladeck
Relying on Prince and Smith, the courts supported state authority to decide whether, and under what conditions, to offer religious exemptions. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 7:42 am
In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for offenders with mental retardation in the case Atkins v. [read post]