Search for: "Stanley v. Justice Court" Results 321 - 340 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 5:54 am by Schachtman
Zedeck, Expert Witness in the Legal System: A Scientist’s Search for Justice 49 (2010) (noting that, after remand from the Supreme Court, Joiner v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
” Importantly, it seems quite plausible that Chief Justice Earl Warren, had he not felt compelled to placate Justice Stanley Reed — the last holdout for Jim Crow — could have written a more muscular opinion in Brown. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 1:28 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
 The abstract to the article states: In the recent case of Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kaminski: Motivated in part by the puzzle of Stanley v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the notorious 1959 Roncarelli v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm by Bexis
Stanley, 384 Mich. 276, 282, 181 N.W.2d 918 (1970). [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 6:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
Considering, inter alia, the well-established “interest of a parent in the companionship, care, custody, and management of his or her children” (Stanley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:55 pm
The pro-incorporation view had been asserted in 1947 by Justice Hugo Black, in his famous dissent in Adamson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Aitken of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, Wellman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
  Professional representation in these cases helps insure that justice is served. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 5:56 pm
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead ruled last week in Laddcap Value Partners, LP v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Justices Scalia and Thomas filed concurring opinions. [read post]