Search for: "State, in the Interest of Gc"
Results 321 - 340
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2008, 2:18 pm
The Lawyer Coach Blog reports that LMA Toronto launched with a sell-out event.The Legal Scoop by law students gives job interview tips at Interviewing.The Legal Thing reports on Mid-Life Crisis and a potential antidote.the [non]billable hour has a great tip for all of us: Notice What's Right Before Fixing What's WrongThe Prior Art has some tidbits about the saga of The Troll Tracker.The United States blog at Promote the Progess reports about a Patent reform update presented at… [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:34 am
The court was handed an invoice stating he owed R170 951 at the time. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 2:19 pm
Casey Flaherty wrote the following about the state of corporate Legal: “75% of GCs recognize workloads will outpace budgets (problem)” “80% [subscription required] of in-house lawyers are burned out (consequence)” “70% of law departments are not investing in digital transformation (unavailable solution due to resource constraints)” “70% of law departments are asking law firms about technology usage (attempt to cope within resource… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:53 pm
… the court, in its discretion, mayallow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee…. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:12 am
If newsfeeds are not displayed on the screen try going to http://www.law.com/newswire/ and searching for the items of interest. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:13 am
The 9th Circuit, in a 6-5 opinion that delves into the scope and application of the state secrets doctrine, issued an en banc opinion finding that such litigation could reveal state secrets and tossed the case. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:48 pm
The Problem as Cognitive Bias I've highlighted the sections of the GC's email that raise the problem of reactive devaluation -- our tendency to devalue and resist anything our "opponent" offers to us. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
in relation to the recent judgment of the General Court (GC) in Group Nivelles v OHIM, T-15/13. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:51 am
* Mike Godwin has left his role as Wikimedia's GC [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
I recommend the whole piece to those who are interested. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 3:04 pm
I think it is an interesting point of entry into why academic and practicing lawyers are often ships passing in the night. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Claire Poppelwell-Scevak, Strasbourg Observers: ‘Until Social Norms Say I Do’: How the Grand Chamber Taketh and Giveth Away in Fedotova and Others v Russia: on the recent case in which the GC ECtHR held that there is a positive obligation under Article 8 for member states to afford some sort of legal recognition and protection to same-sex couples. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:12 pm
The Strasbourg Court has begun to develop the idea of positive obligation implicit in Article 10 ECHR on the State authorities – for example, in implementation of its responsibility to nurture and further the freedom of the press to carry out its investigative functions in the public interest. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
X and Canon II.3.6 suffice to make the measure constitutional, or even canonical (which at bottom has to be the same thing, because the Constitution limits what GC may enact as Canons)? [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
GC & Others v CNIL The Court was asked a number of questions, all of which broadly related to the question of how the prohibitions on processing sensitive personal data under the Directive applied to search engines. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:27 am
The author, writing on the GC's behalf, recommends against the A312. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
California) and Cisco’s GC speaks out (loudly) about H-P’s efforts to enforce its noncompetes. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
And indeed, the discrimination wrinkle adds an interesting dimension to the analysis of religious rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
To have a complete scenario on what's going on with that, the European Commission published a public consultation on it, seeking views from a whole bevy of interested parties about their experiences in enforcing IP rights in Europe. [read post]
