Search for: "State in the Interest of Jane Doe" Results 321 - 340 of 952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 3:32 pm by Law Offices of Daniel A. Hunt
But the deceased owner’s share does not automatically pass to the surviving owners. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But because it chose 48, that figure has the force of stare decisis going for it, whereas 24 does not.Meanwhile, there is a further problem (which our brief does expressly invoke) that would arise if the arbitrariness of some line at X were a reason to reject it in favor of an equally arbitrary line X-minus-Y: the procedure has no logical stopping point other than zero. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:38 am by Jane Turner
I think…we are having this conversation nowadays, to be here, to be talking to you Jane, and to hear about what is going on in the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Or b/c the 1A does and should extend only to thick autonomy interests? [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:47 pm
Justice Brandeis states that "Sharing in the goodwill of an article unprotected by patent or trademark is the exercise of a right possessed by all - and in the free exercise of which the consuming public is deeply interested. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Mr Kelleher had circulated an email to 54 individuals stating: “I have requested that Jane Clift’s name be added to the register of violent persons following repeated threats of violence towards a member of staff. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Lucero, written by Judge David Stras and joined by Judge Bobby Shepherd (Judge Jane Kelly dissenting in major part): Carl and Angel Larsen wish to make wedding videos. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:59 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
Does Not Define ‘Best Interest’ The proposal does not define the term “best interest,” an omission that drew criticism from some SEC commissioners. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:59 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
Does Not Define ‘Best Interest’ The proposal does not define the term “best interest,” an omission that drew criticism from some SEC commissioners. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:22 pm
See also In the Interest of Jane Doe, 887 P.2d 645 (Haw. 1994) (applying the T.L.O. framework and upholding search of a student’s purse). 13 Id; see also Safford Unified Sch. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:12 am by S. COTUS
  It is pretty rare that case begins with the words “Fourth-party plaintiff Jane Doe (“Doe”)). [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:26 am by Chris Mirasola
  Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, during a visit to Japan, said that Singapore has “key interests” in the South China Sea, despite the fact that it is not a claimant State and does not take sides on the dispute. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
Four of the plaintiffs (Paul Harrison, two John Does, and a Jane Doe) claim that Section 2(c) of the E.O. will “prolong their separation from their loved ones,” by preventing them from obtaining visas, while “several” of the plaintiffs claim that the anti-Muslim animus in the executive caused them “feelings of disparagement and exclusion. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 11:05 am by Howard Knopf
 (emphasis added).An interesting aspect of this ruling is that the Court appointed three attorneys ad litem (the “Ad Litems”) to represent the Does. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:54 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Prior to this case, one other Ontario court considered a claim like this one in Jane Doe 464533 v. [read post]