Search for: "State v. Duty"
Results 321 - 340
of 31,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 10:09 am
The extent of those responsibilities and duties were examined in the recent, unpublished case of Mariano Simota Bailey v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:33 pm
Jones, where the President is sued for actions outside of his official duties as President of the United States, but different from Clinton v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:15 pm
The post Skilling V. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:24 am
“In Brownfield v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada says that a core aspect of a lawyer’s duty of loyalty is the “duty of commitment to the client’s cause (sometimes referred to as ‘zealous representation’)” (R v Neil 2002 SCC 70 at para. 19). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:18 am
Akron Paint & Varnish, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:49 am
In working on its analysis of the motion, the court stated that PersonalWeb's duty to preserve evidence arose when litigation became reasonably foreseeable. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:05 pm
In the case, Goodwin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:05 pm
In the case, Goodwin v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:07 pm
In the case of Lamm v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 12:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:16 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In WA Interpreters v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 12:59 pm
Matter of Paul Mazzotte v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner was a correction officer for over 20 years. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
In Desrosiers v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:30 pm
On April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:12 pm
On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm
In First Mercury Insurance Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:14 am
" Gemshares LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:16 pm
(Id. at p. 1163; see Randi W., 14 Cal.4th at p. 1077 [one who negligently provides false information to another can owe a duty of care to a third person “who did not receive the information and who has no special relationship with the provider”].)We therefore do not find persuasive those out-of-state cases discounting the role of foreseeability (see, e.g., Huck v. [read post]
