Search for: "State v. Ege"
Results 321 - 340
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2022, 12:06 pm
Especially useful are efforts to batter publicize and simplify the means for individuals to protect their (reproductive) rights in the face of state interference (see, eg here). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Loewy’s article, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
This provision states that “[t]he High Court may by order (whether interlocutory or final) grant an injunction … in all cases in which it appears to be just and convenient to do so. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:20 am
The AG concluded that Member States may exclude reproduction devices from payment of levies when an objective justification exists. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
[from the IPBiz post Harvard Business Review article: Plagiarize with Pride in August 2006; see alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/12/plagiarism-kind-of-defense.html]In the memo's section on 12(b)(6), there is a point on federal jurisdiction:See Immunocept, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
He noted that though the business community (along with NGOs and local governments) were excluded from the Paris negotiation these GHG programs might prove a good means creating robust governance beyond the state but in conjunction with states. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
As the rest of the language in Article V spells out, dioceses come into existence in just one of three ways: by dividing an existing diocese, by joining all or parts of two dioceses, or by making a diocese out of an "unorganized evangelized area. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Its formal first reading was on 26 May 2010 and its second reading on 9 July 2010: In response to the Bill, the new Government stated a commitment to bring forward its own proposals. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
See Douez v Facebook, Inc [2017] 1 SCR 751. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am
In the landmark decision of Calder v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:23 am
du Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele 2 Polska sp. z o.o., now Netia SA. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 2:18 am
The Sun may also seek to argue that the defamatory imputations are substantially true, although such a defence will fail if they are found to have over-egged the pudding. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am
The prosecution arguments and the decisions were throughout framed as being concerned with the question of whether a public hearing would have the tendency to frustrate the administration of justice (eg,[4]). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:57 am
Safety Nat’l Casualty Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:47 am
Handsome Brook Farm, LLC v. [read post]
