Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 321 - 340 of 8,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 7:26 am by Benjamin Goh
Last year, former GuestKat Jan Jacobi reported both the Warsaw District Court’s Referral to the CJEU and AG Rantos’ Opinion on the TB v Castorama Polska and Knor litigation (see IPKat posts here and here). [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
There are carveouts for dual U.S. citizens and green card holders, but other lawfully present Chinese nationals face further restrictions. [read post]
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:59 pm by Nathan Lee and Daniel Yannuzzi
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous decision in the case of Amgen Inc. et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am by Scott Bomboy
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:50 am by Gary Burger
” If it’s not an ERISA plan, medical providers have no lien at all; it’s an old case called Schweiss v Sisters of Mercy, because you can’t assign a personal injury case. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Weigel
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am by Michael C. Dorf
That everyone includes holders of bonds issued before the government hit the debt ceiling, so they would not be injured. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States as well as in Germany, claim construction is resolved by courts as a question of law (not fact). [read post]