Search for: "State v. Jose V."
Results 321 - 340
of 1,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 3:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:58 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Supplemental jury instruction Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Howard County, appellant Jose I. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:50 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Video evidence Appellant, Jose Antonio Gemeil, was indicted in the Circuit Court for Caroline County, Maryland, and charged with robbery with a dangerous weapon and related counts. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of San Jose, (2015) 61 Cal.4th 435, which upheld a residential inclusionary zoning ordinance by the City of San Jose. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of San Jose, (2015) 61 Cal.4th 435, which upheld a residential inclusionary zoning ordinance by the City of San Jose. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
ACLU v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm
Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo V. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm
Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo V. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am
See Dawson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:04 am
Such a result might well, in turn, result in a new form of indefinite, long-term, non-criminal detention, but then again the administration might also choose at some point to shift Khattalah into military custody (perhaps within the United States, a la Jose Padilla, or perhaps even at GTMO). [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:15 pm
V. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
In its landmark 2004 decision in Hamdi v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:22 pm
”); Johnston v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
”[6] What about Plessey v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
(i)),1 and the trial court sentenced him to six years in state prison. [read post]
