Search for: "State v. M. Root" Results 321 - 340 of 913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 pm by Ronald Mann
” In the same way, detailed footnotes support the view that the same usage pervaded the Supreme “Court’s early 20th-century cases …, [m]any state court cases, … a variety of federal statutes, … [a]nd state statutes too. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
All laws of civil redress have root in some religious tradition, and these laws do not radically or offensively differ from traditions in the law of the various United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Mark Nakahara
Some states followed his lead. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
     More unfair advantage, but only where the goods are “luxury” enoughKenzo Tsujimoto v EUIPO, Joined Cases C‑85/16 P and C‑86/16 P, CJEU (May 2018)Kenzo is a French fashion house with Japanese roots. [read post]