Search for: "State v. Outing" Results 321 - 340 of 90,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm by Schachtman
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by MBettman
He pulled up behind a pick-up truck bearing out-of-county license plates. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:36 am by Immigration Prof
Supreme Court website Lyle Denniston on SCOTUSBlog reports that the Texas Attorney General has sought a 30 day extension to January 20, 2016 to respond to the U.S. government's petition for certiorari in Texas v.... [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
         The High Court points out that absent an agreement among the States, disputes over the allocation of water are subject to equitable apportionment by the courts, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
         The High Court points out that absent an agreement among the States, disputes over the allocation of water are subject to equitable apportionment by the courts, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
         The High Court points out that absent an agreement among the States, disputes over the allocation of water are subject to equitable apportionment by the courts, Arizona v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Fifteen state attorneys general have signed this letter to US AG Eric Holder, asking him to appeal the atrocious decision of the US District Court in DC in Beaty v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 10:26 am by Howard Bashman
Gee could pave the way for states to restrict abortion access out of existence”: Ian Millhiser and Anna North of Vox have this report. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by sally
Maroudas v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280; [2010] WLR (D) 81 “An application under s 53(5) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to upgrade a byway from a road used as a public path to a byway open to all traffic did not need to be made in a single document. [read post]