Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,077
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 6:48 am
Supreme Court decision, Feres v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
Chapter 124, then the state personnel board of review shall make an investigation. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
Wisconsin, about whether a state law authorizing a blood draw from an unconscious motorist requires a warrant; and Rehaif v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Drawing on and quoting from Printz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
The complaint emphasizes a 2012 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), in which the committee noted that it could “not prove wrongdoing” but that Huawei had failed to proactively alleviate congressional security concerns. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Through this posturing, the ultra-conservative members of both houses can impress their base and hope against hope that one of these laws will lead to the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
They lay out concerns about current members of the White House staff in addition to Kushner, including questions about whether Trump’s second national security adviser, John Bolton, revealed on his security clearance application his work with Maria Butina (who pleaded guilty in December 2018 to conspiring with senior Russian official Alexander Torshin to infiltrate the conservative movement in the United States as an agent of the Russian government). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
Vacha v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
Sullivan, Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
” Today, the justices agreed to decide in Iancu v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm
On the other hand, neither the Departments of Veteran’s Affairs (VA) or Health and Human Services (HHS) included BAA-specific training for their personnel, a deficiency the GAO recommended be corrected. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Note, moreover, that language deficiencies tend to affect some receiving states much more than others. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm
The United States is the world leader in AI research and development (R&D) and deployment. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:53 am
Dismissal was reversed with instructions to allow the agency to amend as to the second grower (EEOC v. [read post]
