Search for: "State v. Robert Smith" Results 321 - 340 of 1,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:53 am by Amy Howe
”  And Lisa Soronen of the State and Local Legal Center looks at the Roberts Court from the perspective of state and local governments. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:45 am
Edwin Smith testified as an expert witness for the State defendants. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In Robert Comer's case, his close friend, Robert Vickers, whom he had met on Arizona's death row, was executed in 1999. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 1574 (21 December 2011) Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 1616 (21 December 2011) Kinnear v Whittaker [2011] EWCA Civ 1609 (21 December 2011) Q (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1610 (21 December 2011) Delaney v Pickett & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 (21 December 2011) Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd (t/a Galliford Try Rail) [2011] EWCA… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]