Search for: "State v. Savage" Results 321 - 340 of 866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am by Elina Saxena
" David Ryan shed light on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in the United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
And Title V does the same with various national security letter statutes, thereby preventing any of these laws from being used for bulk collection. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:48 am by Amy Howe
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Timothy Sandefur has the first in a series of blog posts on North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen weighs in on Lomax v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Ayestas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico, Burgess Everett reports that “[v]oters in three conservative states where Senate Democrats are up for reelection want their senators to support … Kavanaugh,” according to a new GOP poll. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
(See Corley v Burger King Corp., 56 F3d 709, 710 [5th Cir 1995]; Martin v Savage Truck Line, 121 F Supp 417, 419 [DDC 1954]). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 2:20 am by Amy Howe
”   [Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in State Water Contractors v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” In today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin has an article headlined “Supreme Court Poised to Rule Against Excessive State Fines; In Timbs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
”  Writing for the Los Angeles Times, David Savage, Carol J. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Texas (state may not prohibit homosexual acts between consenting adults), Mapp v. [read post]