Search for: "State v. Weiss"
Results 321 - 340
of 704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 7:34 am
Sanford’s focus on rebutting the government’s assertions thus fails to engage the appropriate inquiry under Weiss v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 am
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, L.L.P., No 09 Civ. 5593 (RJS)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
See Sandoz, 553 F.3d at 921;see, e.g., Yeboah, 2007 WL 3232509, at *3 (citing Weiss v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Weiss, Wexler & Wornow, PC, New York City (J. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Weiss, Wexler & Wornow, PC, New York City (J. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:14 am
On Tuesday, the Court will hear arguments in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
” Id., at 763 and 766, citing Weiss v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am
(See Hallock v State of New York, supra; Kelley v Chavez, 33 AD3d 590 [2006]; Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
” As the Second Circuit said in Weiss v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:44 am
Ct., 2003) (state law pre-empted), and Weiss v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
See Kliger-Weiss Infosys/ems. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Executive Compensation, Long-Term value, Repurchases, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, Taxation Marking to Market Versus Taking to Market Posted by Guillaume Plantin (Sciences Po) and Jean Tirole (University of Toulouse & IAST) , on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Contracts, Fair values, Information… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:22 pm
Bruce Nye has more details about Pioneer Electronics v. [read post]
14 Jun 2006, 9:32 am
State of Indiana 49S04-0510-CR-475 49G04-0207-MR-193968 06/14/06 David Weiss v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:47 pm
YCB INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:44 am
” Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal reviews this week’s dissent by Justice Kagan in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:54 am
Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, under the circumstances, the County was immune from liability under the doctrine of qualified immunity (see Friedman v State of New York, 67 NY2d 271, 283; Weiss v Fote, 7 NY2d 579, 584), as the County's delay in the rebuilding and installation of the traffic signal was not unreasonable in the context of the County's attempts to remedy a known dangerous highway condition once the decision was made to… [read post]
