Search for: "State v. William Strong" Results 321 - 340 of 1,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The state has a legitimate interest in maintaining its precinct-based voting system; there is a strong public interest that militates against changing the rules during early voting. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Michael Kimberly
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees than just the First Amend­ment. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm by Guest Author
But that record has evaporated thanks to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:39 am by Mark Graber
  “Our cases have recognized that the Due Process Clauses generally confer no affirmative right to governmental aid,” the Chief Justice’s predecessor, William Rehnquist, asserted in DeShaney v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
Shanmugam of the Washington, D.C.., office of the Williams & Connolly law firm. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” It was good enough for “separate but equal” segregation in many states up to the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am by Anna Christensen
At Concurring Opinions, links are available for all articles in the most recent issue of the NYU Law Review, including a piece in which William Curran examines the Takings Clause in the context of the Court's ruling in Kelo v. [read post]