Search for: "State v. York" Results 321 - 340 of 35,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2021, 9:06 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The NY Amendments are set to take effect on January 26, 2022 and will make New York the latest state to follow New Jersey’s historic lead in enacting the most pro-employee whistleblower statutes in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Thus New Yorkers need not worry that police without warrants or cause could attach such devices to their vehicles in New York and record the vehicles' minute by minute location.In People v Buchanan (6/30/09) the Court again found that the New York Constitution provides protections that have not been clearly found under the United State Constitution. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
In a case on remand from the 2nd Circuit, a New York federal district court (without opposition from the state) has issued an injunction against New York state's COVID-19 restrictions on houses of worship. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 In Alliance to End Chickens as Kaporos v New York City Police Department, (App. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:23 am by By DEALBOOK
In the election for state comptroller, incumbent Thomas P. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:49 pm
On February 11, 2009, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in  LMK Psychological Servs. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 301 (2018): While he was on the New York Court of Appeals, Benjamin Cardozo wrote a number of opinions on state tax issues. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Forfeiture of employee's retirement contributions made to a New York State public retirement system United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:07 am by sally
R (One Search Direct Holdings Ltd (trading as One Search Direct)) v York City Council [2010] EWHC 590 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 87 “In failing to provide access to unrefined information, the council was not acting in a way that was contrary to the Government’s intention not to impose an obligation on authorities to allow such access, nor to the aims and purposes of the statutory provisions, including the subsidiary legislation made by the Secretary of State. [read post]