Search for: "Stevens v. Doe et al"
Results 321 - 340
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
The Honorable Cynthia M. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
See Donna Stroup, et al., “Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting,” 283 J. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
Bush Administration to Justice Stevens: Drop Dead (July 12, 2006)119. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Cheng does not explain why, under his proposed “consensus rule,” subject matter experts are needed at all. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
It is noteworthy that the PRA does not provide any cause of action against the agency on the ground that the agency made errors on its estimate.[11] The most that can happen is that if the OMB does not approve it, the agency is unable to enforce the regulation.[12] What types of costs, then, would not be included in the SEC’s paperwork burden estimate? [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
Green issued his second supplemental decision Sept. 21, 2001. *** Tower Industries, Inc., d/b/a Allied Mechanical (31-CA-26605, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 117) Ontario, CA May 31, 2007. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
.) *** ELC Electric, Inc. (25-CA-28270-1, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 17) Indianapolis, IN Sept. 28, 2006. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Cullen issued his decision Feb. 20, 2003. *** BE&K Construction Co. (32-CA-9479, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 29) Pittsburg, CA Sept. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
What follows is a compendium of substantive analyses on some of the key issues of the War on Terror by the authors here at Balkinization.The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Civil Liberties, the War on Terror and Presidential PowerPart I-- Civil LibertiesPart II-- Presidential Power and Constitutional StructurePart III-- Torture and the "Torture Memos"Part IV- The NSA Controversy and Government SurveillancePart V-- HamdanPart VI-- The Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
I am, however, excerpting below passages from an expert declaration on laws of war issues I prepared in the last Agent Orange litigation that addresses basic issues on jus in bello proportionality, the difficulties of criminal liability for alleged breaches of proportionality duties, and what the Yugoslavia tribunal prosecutor's office said - under Louise Arbour herself, if I recall correctly, although she joined the Supreme Court of Canada in 1999, so perhaps not - when it was raised as an… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
– Steven M. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
– Steven M. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Sherwin, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, Director of the Visual Persuasion Project, New York Law School -- Law in the Shadow of Violence: The Riddle and the Paradox of Sovereignty W. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Although the demolition or renovation of a single-family residence is exempt from Asbestos NESHAP requirements, the exemption does not apply where the demolition is part of a larger commercial project. [read post]
