Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court partially granted Plaintiff's petition in part, annulling that part of the agency determination as denied Plaintiff's request with respect to certain documents, holsinf that they were subject to disclosure, and Respondent appealed. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court partially granted Plaintiff's petition in part, annulling that part of the agency determination as denied Plaintiff's request with respect to certain documents, holsinf that they were subject to disclosure, and Respondent appealed. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court partially granted Plaintiff's petition in part, annulling that part of the agency determination as denied Plaintiff's request with respect to certain documents, holsinf that they were subject to disclosure, and Respondent appealed. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court partially granted Plaintiff's petition in part, annulling that part of the agency determination as denied Plaintiff's request with respect to certain documents, holsinf that they were subject to disclosure, and Respondent appealed. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Let's dive right in! [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
Right now, Dems need to discuss abortion and women's rights directly. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:11 am
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Richmond County. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 3:48 pm
The ILB has quoted from several recent stories about how the cameras in trial courtrooms pilot project sponsored by the Supreme Court is failing. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:12 am
Normally, when plaintiffs win only one dollar at trial, they get no fees, as per a Supreme Court ruling, Farrar v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:17 am
The Constitution thus created life tenure for Supreme Court justices in order to remove them from political domination. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 8:23 am
How can the role of the Supreme People’s Court be described in criminal procedure developments? [read post]
27 May 2017, 6:17 am
Attorney General Sessions, meanwhile, has announced the government will appeal the Fourth Circuit's ruling to the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 7:01 am
When deciding the Dow case, the Supreme Court noted there was a difference between searches of the "curtilage" of one's home and the "open fields" nearby. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Ninth Circuit Sends the Hawaii Concealed Carry Challenge Back Down to District Court
19 Aug 2022, 1:30 pm
" As the Court observed in Bruen, "handguns are weapons 'in common use' today for self-defense. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
A jury, and not an appellate court, observes the witnesses and listens to their testimony; therefore, an appellate court must not interfere with the jury's role in assessing the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
If we date aggressive judicial review as starting with the infamous Dred Scott case in 1857, and we date the Court's first originalist majority from the time Justice Barrett was confirmed, that's over 160 years without an originalist Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
Ervine (California Supreme Court 2009) 47 Cal.4th 745, 783 [constitutional claim forfeited because appellant did not properly raise it below]; People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 1:19 am
An SPC’s report shows by June 2015, ‘The online publication of effective judgement documents has covered all four-level courts (the SPC, High People’s Courts, Intermediate People’s Courts and Basic People’s Courts) and all types of cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 1:00 pm
It seems like people, even Supreme Court Justices, don't think the United States Constitution should apply to driving while intoxicated cases. [read post]
