Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
And the court rejected plaintiffs' claim that they had a substantive due process right not to be observed by members of the opposite sex. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 5:54 am
Said Rushil Umaretiya, who grew up in an Indian immigrant family and will be a freshman at the University of North Carolina.Quoted in "After the Affirmative Action Ruling, Asian Americans Ask What Happens Next/No matter their views of race-conscious admissions, students were wary of the college application process — and some thought little would change" (NYT).Umaretiya's observation is based on what he saw colleges and applicants doing before… [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md) previously introduced the Shareholders United Act of 2019 (H.R. 936), a play on words invoking the Supreme Court's landmark opinion Citizens United, that would allow public company political donations only if a company has in place a procedure to assess the preferences of its shareholders. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:05 am
The Supreme Court instructs that "a component" of a church's "autonomy is the selection of the individuals who play certain key roles. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
To many Court observers, we could probably stop there. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:45 pm
Now, the Court is to decide whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is "testimonial" evidence.In layman's terms, the question is whether lab reports get admitted because, heck, of course they're always accurate so there's no need to cross-examine the folks who did the tests and wrote the reports? [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
According to the blurb at the publisher's website, he surveys the history of the Supreme Court, looking at various times when the Court's rulings have been flouted or ignored, and then discusses what he believes the Court did to create public trust in its authority and what it must to do maintain that trust. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Hurst v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:37 am
"Easily the most annoying recent example of not-apparently-villainous people who are living in denial about the stakes in today's debates, however, is the response by some nominal centrists and liberals to proposals to expand the size of the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:28 am
He's right that she's been the best civil liberties champion on SCOTUS, so it's good to see that record illuminated and broadcast more widely beyond the narrow audience of people who read Supreme Court opinions.For Grits, who falls in the even narrower audience of people who read Texas Court of Criminal Appeals opinions, it's hard not to read the story and see… [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 8:36 pm
Move For a Discovery Sanction - Suppression of Evidence Is and Should Be Required When the State Fails to Retain Video In 2011 the Illinois Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm
His high majority count would greatly exceed any other Justice's count. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 8:55 am
Unlike appellate judges and Supreme Court justices, trial judges must directly confront the impact they have on people’s lives. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
"Illness on Trial," is the title of a Sunday editorial in Raleigh's News & Observer. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Note that the transcript does not contain the word "laughter" after Justice Scalia's observation. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
In this Very Short Introduction, she draws on her deep knowledge of the court's history and of its written and unwritten rules to show readers how the Supreme Court really works. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:32 pm
It's quite strange that people subscribe to the pro-life "hypocrisy" argument. [read post]
