Search for: "Sweden v State"
Results 321 - 340
of 752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2015, 10:49 am
Sweden has arrested two Swedish citizens on “suspicion of terrorist crimes in committing murder” while fighting in Syria in 2013. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 10:07 am
Bouveng v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:05 am
State Department, her former employers, and her family and friends, as well as to the public at large. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:52 am
BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin) [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
Circuit’s opinion in al Bahlul v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
Sweden Sweden has one of the highest proportions of Internet users in the world and, like many other countries, has a problem with anonymous online abuse. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Yücel is a citizen of Sweden . . ., and was extradited from the Republic of Moldova to the United States in May 2014.U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
Mozes v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:53 pm
So while "Carlwig v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The United States is party to 51, including the North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:26 am
He was also taken to court in Sweden over copyright infringement.As said above only one question was referred to the ECJ: "May the Member States give wider protection to the exclusive right of authors by enabling “communication to the public” to cover a greater range of acts than provided for in Article 3(2) of [Directive 2001/29]? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
The request for a preliminary ruling came from the Supreme Court of Sweden. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
A smiling TV 2 Norway (new owner of C More) CEO possibly pictured before the CJEU rulingLast week this blog reported on the latest decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public within Article 3 of the InfoSoc Directive, this being C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, C-279/13.BackgroundAs readers will remember, this was yet another reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* BREAKING: CJEU says that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive but Member States can protect themHere's another insightful take by Eleonora on the surreal CJEU decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment, a reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly hyperlink-loving Member State, Sweden, which was supposed to address linking and copyright. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
45835/05, § 68, 31 July 2012; Dammann v. [read post]
