Search for: "T. D." Results 321 - 340 of 136,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2011, 5:27 am by Glenn Reynolds
NICK SCHULZ: Yes, I’d trust a Randian banker (if only more banks were like BB&T). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:43 am by Glenn Reynolds
FOOT IN THE DOOR: “The imagery coming out of the Indian trip isn’t as pretty as I thought they’d make it. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:08 am by William Carleton
 Congress shouldn't let states define the "disqualification" standards. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:04 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T [2008] EWCA Civ 199; [2008] WLR (D) 91 “A supervision order made pursuant to s 31 of and para 6 of Sch 3 to the Children Act 1989 had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:52 pm by Angel Reyes III
Process is the process, I mean you can’t really do anything about time. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:49 am
Le Groupe Saint-Gobain recherche pour son Département de Propriété Industrielle rattaché à Saint-Gobain Recherche (Aubervilliers), des ingénieurs brevets confirmés. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 10:54 am
I can’t let the 65th anniversary of D-Day pass without a short blog to honor my late client, Dominic, from Luzerne County. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:07 pm by Sylvain Métille
Le Tribunal fédéral a rendu au début de ce mois une décision en matière de surveillance téléphonique (1B_211/2012). [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:38 am by Laurent Teyssèdre
Dans une communication téléphonique, le premier examinateur avait indiqué que l'objet ainsi modifié [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:45 am by William Carleton
Those who don't earn 6-figure salaries or don't have million dollar net worths are still automatically protected (it's slightly Orwellian, isn't it, to say "protected" where the context requires the word "excluded"), as they are today; and the millionaires who perceive themselves to be unsophisticated can avail themselves of state protection, too. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm by Ken White
Dinesh D'Souza's Sentence Isn't Remarkable © 2007-2014 by the authors of Popehat. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus, the Board came to the conclusion that the technical activity of step A did not interact with the mental activities of steps B to E to lead to a tangible technical result and therefore had to be ignored in the assessment of inventive step. [12] The Board considers that the present case clearly differs from the case underlying decision T 784/06. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La revendication 1 portait sur un procédé de fabrication d'articles absorbants.L'Opposante GDM avait soumis un usage antérieur, constitué par la vente en 2009 d'une de ses machines "Neos 3", mettant en oeuvre ce procédé, à la société SCA.La division d'opposition avait décidé que le procédé n'avait pas… [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:39 am by Aaron Moss
As in most fair use situations, these two factors don’t do much heavy lifting in this case. [read post]