Search for: "Thomas v. Clerk of the Circuit Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held in 1990). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:22 pm
Supreme Court] Nken v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:11 pm
Vance Biskupic relays that after oral arguments in Vance, the vote was 5-4 to affirm the Second Circuit. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
” Commentary on this week’s decision by the court to send Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm
I spent two years clerking in the federal district court, and then one year in the circuit court. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
Evans, 536 U.S. 452, 492 (2002) (Thomas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part; joined in relevant part by Kennedy, J.); DOC v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
By contrast, Justice Clarence Thomas, noted for his newfound verbosity in the court’s remote hearings, appeared to lean into the decontextualized reading suggested by Mortara (his former clerk). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Alito, Jr., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
" The Ninth Circuit announced yesterday that it would delay consideration of a gun rights case, issuing an order in Nordyke et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit! [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:21 pm
One of the pending cases, Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:44 am
In the thinly-reasoned opinion of Stuart v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
A Seventh Circuit case authored by Judge Posner, Sandage v Vanderburgh County, explained the principle further. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:01 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
In addition, some said Verrilli should have repeatedly focused attention on Court precedents like Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
