Search for: "Toy v. Toy" Results 321 - 340 of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2010, 4:02 am by Walter Olson
[CNN, earlier] More: “Why the government has no business banning Happy Meals” [Steve Chapman] “Banning Happy Meals Could Be Bad for Kids” [Atlantic Wire] Tags: McDonald's, obesity, San Francisco Related posts “San Francisco bans Happy Meals” (10) “Hello, I’m with the government and I’m here to help you eat” (1) Pelman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Luen Fat Metal and Plastic Manufactory Limited v Jacobs & Turner Limited t/a Trespass [2019] EWHC 118.BackgroundThe Claimant owns:a series of 3 UK word marks: FUNTIME, FUN TIME, and FUN-TIME in respect of “Class 28: Games, toys and playthings; electronic games”.an EU trade mark for the word FUNTIME for the same goods in class 28. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
The apple for the day, just to be sure you keep the doctor away, is Apple Inc v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:14 pm
Tomorrow: the Ninth Circuit’s amended decision applying the “new” Trademark Dilution Revision Act standards in Jada Toys v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:21 am by SHG
Years ago, the Supreme Court in Katz v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 12:50 pm by Adam Thierer
TweetDeck (v.34): I have no idea how the folks at TweetDeck make any money, but they produce one the most spectacular pieces of freeware on the planet. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
North Charles Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Inc. v City of Cambridge, 2020 WL 1488531 (MA App. unrep. 3/26/2020) [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 1:02 pm
Play-by-Play Toys & Novelties, Inc., 208 F.3d 368, 374-78 (2nd Cir. 2000) (construing Apfel).See also Paul v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s March 2020 ruling that a “Bad Spaniels” dog toy marketed by VIP Products was an expressive work entitled to First Amendment protections against trademark infringement liability under the Rogers test. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 10:03 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s March 2020 ruling that a “Bad Spaniels” dog toy marketed by VIP Products was an expressive work entitled to First Amendment protections against trademark infringement liability under the Rogers test. [read post]