Search for: "U.S. Insulation Corp." Results 321 - 340 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 706(2), confines judicial review of agency action to a specific list of errors—a court may set aside agency actions that are: (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law;  … (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (D) without observance of procedure required by law; … Section 706(2) is famously deferential to agencies, but it doesn’t insulate… [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
While their operations are global, they often seek, as in this case, to have only the laws of the U.S. apply to their businesses.[8] They want all the benefits of carrying on business in Canada and around the world, but want to insulate themselves from liability under local laws. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
NEWEST ADDITION TO HECHT COURT'S IMMUNITY JURIS(MAL)PRUDENCE:    DRUNK DRIVER IMMUNITY    Here is yet another example of the Texas Supreme Court's penchant for creating and invoking immunity theories to deny plaintiffs their day in court against a party that caused injury, and thereby preventing a trial on the merits and recovery of damages from the tortfeasor proven to have committed the tort. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
- H - Hazmat Hazardous materials, as classified by the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
  Well, also as predicted, the Obama administration today petitioned (more here) the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - the court responsible for the "bombshell" ruling in GPX Int'l Tire Corp v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
Gerritt Schepers was in a New Jersey case, brought by an Owens-Corning Fiberglas plantworker, who worked on making OCF’s Kaylo insulation.[7] The plantworker had undeniable asbestos exposure from which he had developed peritoneal mesothelioma. [read post]