Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Smith" Results 321 - 340 of 771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States 21-171Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Both cases involve the process of inter partes review added to the Patent Act in 2012 as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 10(a).Although the courts have recognized certain common law exceptions for vacating an arbitration award, See Footnote 3 the United States Supreme Court recently held that the grounds listed in the statute are the exclusive grounds for vacating an arbitration award under the FAA. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm by FDABlog HPM
—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to any application for extension of a patent term under section 156 of title 35, United States  Code, that is pending on, that is filed after, or as to which a decision regarding the application is subject to judicial review on, the date of the enactment of this Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
  The following cases were granted for argument in the 2010 Term: Title: Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am by Sean Hanover
Petitioner “turned his back” on the gang as a requisite for coming to the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court predictably handed down the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
  Similarly, the United States Congress is elected by American voters. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
” The anchor declared that the attackers had earned “the evil distinction of having perpetrated a criminal outrage almost unique in America’s history. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
Plaintiff-Appellant United States of America ("the government") brings this interlocutory appeal challenging an order to suppress the fruits of a wiretap used in the government's case against the Defendants-Appellees, and an order denying the government's motion for reconsideration. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Rachael Vaughn
”[1] Before passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, the best mode requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]