Search for: "US v. Flowers"
Results 321 - 340
of 767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2018, 2:48 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
Readers can take advantage of a 30% discount by using the code ALAUTHC4 on the Oxford University Press website. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 5:16 am
Sometimes words are used to assist in conveying those messages. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
Marco Rubio’s tweet about Bolton’s testimony, 1/6/20 United States’ Supplemental Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing, U.S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
(relisted after the January 10 and January 17 conferences) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
The application sought to repress the unauthorized use of Banksy's registered trade marks and reproductions of his/her artworks in the context of an art exhibition in Milan.The text of the decision in RG 52442/2018 Pest Control Office Limited v 24 Ore Cultura s.r.l. is available here.Let's see what happened.BackgroundThe applicant, Pest Control Office, is responsible for issuing certificates of authenticity re Banksy's artworks, and for selling his artworks and… [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:25 am
In Wooley v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
I cannot use the vase on my table (in Seattle) to hold flowers growing in Maryland unless either the vase or the flowers move location. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
The Court will determine whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to hold that the claimants were entitled to a remedy in the tort of private nuisance by reason of the Tate Modern’s use of the top floor of its Blavatnik Building as a viewing platform. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Flowers v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
In City Chain Stores (S) Pte, Ltd. vs Louis Vuitton Malletier, the Court of Appeal of Singapore overturned the trial court which enjoined City Chain Stores of using Louis Vuitton's flower quatrefoil, and flower quatrefoil diamond designs, because it deemed that City Chain Stores used the designs in a random pattern and non-uniform way and therefore not in a origin-related use but for embellishment and decorative purposes. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at Flowers v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:09 am
Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (McCarthy Flowers). [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Back in February, the Court of Appeal in IPCom v Vodafone overturned the first instance decision of Mr Recorder Douglas Campbell QC who held that Vodafone could benefit from what seems to be the somewhat mythical defence of Crown use. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Wade and of cases like Griswold v Connecticut, which recognized the right of married couples to use contraception, because the word privacy was not used in the Constitution. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
Not all that detailed, the Second Circuit ruled on August 15th, in the case of Scholz Design, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Resource: courtlistener.com/opinion/2736401/vms-v-alfonso/? [read post]
