Search for: "United States et al v. Smith" Results 321 - 340 of 460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
As we discussed in our post on NFA annual compliance obligations, commodity pool operators will need to submit annual audited reports to the NFA by March 31 of this year. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 10:21 am by Writing Clinic
”The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed this question in Gove v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 am by tom
UNITED STATES 09-1302    BOEING COMPANY v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) N D Ohio: Damages award exceeding stipulated 4% royalty rate was not excessive: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by Marie Louise
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Rincon Band of Indians (10-330) and Applera Corp., et al., v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Talcott, et al., “Asbestos-associated Diseases in a Cohort of Cigarette-Filter Workers,” 321 N.Engl.J.Med. 1220 (1989). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Don Cruse
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]