Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 321 - 340
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
The Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) creates federal jurisdiction over “any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
” (Judicial Division of the Council of State, 11 May 2011, 201011782/1/V1) The second example concerns a Palestinian gay from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:40 am
Filed under: Alien Tort Statute Tagged: Alien Tort Statute, Harvard University, Kiobel, New York City, Supreme Court, United States, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm
That is the question that the plaintiffs in Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
In Kiobel, the Court held there was no jurisidiction over claims where all of the alleged relevant conduct occurred outside of the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
” A little over a week later, she married a Dutch national fighting for ISIS. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
United States continues this week. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
The people of the United States have just won a great victory in the war to bring democracy and majority rule to Iraq. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
But the court did not reach the question, resolving the case based on the presumption against extraterritoriality because “all the relevant conduct” giving rise to Kiobel’s claims took place outside the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
In Sarei v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
Related posts: Kiobel–The Plot Thickens New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed Keitner on Kiobel and the future of the Alien Tort Statute [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeProsecution of Doctor Accused of Agreeing to Treat Jihadists for al Qaeda Is Deemed Constitutional United States v. [read post]
