Search for: "United States v. Progressive, Inc." Results 321 - 340 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first was County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
HolderDocket: 10-545Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Eric E. Johnson
JUDGE GRIESA 11 CV 2472 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jonathan Tasini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law)   United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by David Kemp
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court’s notorious decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by David Kemp
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
As the two largest consumers and producers of energy, there can be no solution to this challenge without the efforts of both China and the United States. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of the United States (recommending denial of certiorari) __________________ Docket: 07-539 Case name: Progress Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:29 am by INFORRM
Breyer, Supreme Court of the United States ·      Honorable Justice D.Y. [read post]