Search for: "United States v. State of Minn."
Results 321 - 340
of 764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
State, 2013 WL 2364079 (Minn. 2013)), just to take a few random examples from a cite check of Atkins. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
30 May 2013, 11:02 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:40 am
Minn.) [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:53 am
When I reported yesterday on a May 10 letter from a bipartisan group of United States Representatives to the ITC concerning injunctive relief over FRAND-pledged standard-essential patents (SEPs) in connection with the investigation of Samsung's complaint against Apple, I had not yet seen a similar letter written by four United States Senators. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:51 pm
Geatz v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
Minn. 2007) In re Rezulin Prods. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Minn. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
This is a new innovation in the United States, with only a few cases like Rio Props. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
See Kelley v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
Minn.) [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Minn. 2012); Pirello v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:09 am
In Ampersand Publishing, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
Minn. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or… [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” United States ex rel. [read post]
