Search for: "Vermont v. Congress" Results 321 - 340 of 427
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 2:25 pm by Gideon Alper
Now 5 do: Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:10 pm
The government asserts that Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
The Court reasoned that Congress had considered the problem of vaccine-induced injuries and provided a remedy that does not require the injured party to identify a manufacturer. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am by JB
Connecticut and Vermont, however, are in the Second Circuit, and Iowa is in the Eighth.) [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Darla Jackson
  On December 20, 1999 the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]