Search for: "Vikram David Amar"
Results 321 - 340
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Today we analyze a very intriguing issue raised by a case that will be heard by the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Given that this week is the first in the Supreme Court’s new Term, it is hardly surprising that I will devote today’s column to a case on the Court’s docket this week. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I offer analysis of a campaign regulation case in which the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Last week, the California legislature approved Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 5 (“ACA 5”) and sent it to the California Secretary of State, who in turn will submit the matter to the people of the state to vote on this November. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Recent news reports and commentary have focused on how U.S. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
There is both good and bad news in the pair of cases, Chiafalo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
On Friday the North Carolina Supreme Court pulled what the Wall Street Journal editorial board called a “switcheroo. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm
When a federal court (especially a U.S. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, we discussed the historical and doctrinal background of so-called certification, a practice by which federal courts (especially federal appellate courts) certify questions to state high courts when cases in federal court might turn in whole or in part on unresolved questions of state law. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Recent weeks have seen members of both parties in the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
In what some commentators believe is one of the most important cases of the Supreme Court’s recently concluded term, Matal v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Last week one of my colleagues saw an article in the Sacramento Bee entitled “How Old is Too Old to Serve [on] Jury Duty? [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In early January, I wrote about Silicon Valley billionaire Tim Draper’s proposed initiative (“Six Californias”) that seeks to bring about a division of California into six separate states. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
With Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the Supreme Court now filled, many are taking stock of her judicial legacy. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
Vikram David Amar, a Justia columnist, is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
My Northwestern colleague, Steve Calabresi, asked me to post this on his behalf: In an earlier post on the Volokh Conspiracy, I described Professors Akhil Reed Amar's and Vikram David Amar's disagreement with an amicus brief that former Attorney General Edwin Meese III, Professor Gary Lawson, and I filed in Moore v. [read post]
