Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re"
Results 321 - 340
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am
Great unanswered Q—we don’t want to think of patent prosecutors as co-inventors, but it’s a fact. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
Also it need not identify w/specificity the rights that have been recaptured—must specify the grant, but can say “publishing agreement,” and we won’t know the content. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
One of the most shocking extensions granted by registration is nationwide priority, even if you are really only using the mark in NY. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Co. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Interviewer: [Y]ou’re saying there’s statutes on the books now[?] [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Co. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
(In re Depakote), ___ F. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
Schechter Poultry Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
., MARQUETTE W. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
., MARQUETTE W. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 12:35 pm
Mirror Lite Co., 304 F.3d 1373, 1378 (Fed.Cir. 2002). [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
They’re somehow sequels to the game—new stories about Duke Nukem. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Five days later, Frank was willing to sign off on Heim, where they granted SJ on lack of substantial similarity. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Presumptively, courts and CO articulate limitations. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
Why would the CO do this? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Unless the Court abandons its policy of routinely relisting cases before granting, or there are new relists Monday morning that are promptly granted after a quickie mop-up Conference (as I write this, the Court’s schedule during the last days before recess is still in flux), these next five cases might be the last ones with a shot at a grant before the Long Conference. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
Haven’t we already had enough of cases captioned Johnson v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
” The relists aren’t the only ones stuck on repeat. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
