Search for: "WHITE v. GROUNDS"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
’ Until Lyndon Johnson got an office on the White House grounds in the Executive Office Building, the only official office for use by the Vice President was in the Capitol building, and it was not until Walter Mondale that the Vice President had an office in the West Wing of the White House. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 4:59 am
In Volokh v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[iv] On October 26, 2022, the court denied Mathur’s motion to dismiss on personal jurisdiction grounds finding that Mathur had sufficient minimum contacts with Delaware. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
However, communication is not always as black and white as a language barrier. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
One might be forgiven for thinking that it is also one that aligns the theoretical foundational thinking of at least some in the American political class with those who advance a similar idea but grounded in the ideals of Marxist-Leninism as it is developing in that great external American 'other'. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:53 am
In the case of Armasuisse v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Lago v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
" Plaintiff then sued Wren for libel, and Chief Judge Beryl Howell (D.D.C.) in Doe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
It is a legal invention and, as such, has analytical heft, but it is entirely bereft of empirical grounding. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:19 am
Although Merpel wonders why the offers were not also made under Part 36, the Judge nevertheless decided that the refusal of the offers by ONI was not "highly unreasonable" (as is the test under see White Book CPR 44.3.12, F & C Alternative Investments (Holdings) v Barthelemy [2012] EWCA Civ 843 at [70] (citing Kiam v MGM), Astex Therapeutics v AstraZeneca [2018] EWCA Civ 2444 at [61]-[78]). [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Prominent Democrats in the 1860s insisted that the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments were unconstitutional on both substantive and procedural grounds. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:47 am
This case covers similar ground as the uncited Hubay v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
Most do not break new legal ground or attract media attention. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Dred Scott is the most obvious example, albeit perhaps too easy—my standard example is instead The Civil RightsCases, which bases a crabbed interpretation of the Thirteenth Amendment on a claim about the public understanding of the relationship between slavery and economic exclusion that is only sustainable under an exclusively white conception of the demos. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
In the face of unyielding white Southern resistance to school desegregation, mid-20th-century liberals became passionate advocates of the view that the Supreme Court, and only the Court, is in charge of interpreting the Constitution. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Yet, as Bush v. [read post]
