Search for: "WINDSOR v. U.S."
Results 321 - 340
of 727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2014, 6:13 pm
That ruling, the judge said, predated the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:50 am
Evans in 1996 and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 10:28 am
. ___ (2014): This Essay proposes a new regulatory regime in response to the Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:57 am
David Weil as the Administrator of the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:21 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:46 pm
Gardner v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:02 am
In contrast, U.S. courts are “increasingly vigilant about counsel using cy-près relief. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm
Windsor. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:54 am
The IRS recently released new guidance to address remaining questions relating to its treatment of same-sex marriages after last year’s U.S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:20 am
Windsor. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
(Another appeals court, the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm
Windsor, striking down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act that refused to recognize same-sex marriages, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 4:36 am
Windsor. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm
Attorney General Schuette is correct to seek en banc review rather than intermediate appellate review from a 3-judge panel; why waste the time and resources.There is no doubt that this case, along with select others from across the nation, will be ultimately decided by the SCOTUS, as in the United States v Windsor. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In 2013, the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In 2013, the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In 2013, the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:40 pm
The panel said the Supreme Court had led the way toward applying that standard by its ruling last June in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
The decision is a reversal for the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:58 am
This means that marriage licenses are being issued here in Oakland County and across the state as this post is being composed.Citing United States v Windsor, the federal court ruled that Article I, section 25 of Michigan's Constitution violated the Equal Protection clause of the U.S. [read post]
