Search for: "Walker v. Day" Results 321 - 340 of 1,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2010, 12:57 pm by Orin Kerr
UPDATE: Upon hearing the news that Judge Walker denied a stay on appeal, but will allow a six-day window to let the defendant-intervenors seek one from higher courts, I plugged in my MagnaZen X53b Crystal Ball and turned it on. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
From the days of Fenton and Conkling, and Arthur and Cornell, and Platt, from the days of David B. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:39 am by Karen Jensen
In Consbec v Walker, the Court of Appeal considered the case of Peter Walker, a former employee of Consbec Inc., a blasting and drilling company operating throughout Canada. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Walker, L Hale, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr and L Dyson) over two days is the appeal of Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:42 pm
Walker is handling both all of the cases against the telecoms, as well as the Al-Haramain v Bush case, which he ruled on last week. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:51 am by Jeralyn
As Mark Eckenwiler pointed out, he was convicted of criminal contempt for violating an injunction against picketing in Walker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:35 am by Steven M. Sweat
A verdict was recently reached in Los Angeles County in the case of Cardona v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Perhaps the biggest decision of the day came in Comptroller v Wynne, in which the Court – in an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito – held that Maryland’s personal income tax scheme violated the Constitution’s dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
Other coverage and commentary continue to focus on Monday’s oral arguments in Walker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 1:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The purpose is not determine guilt or innocence, but to determine whether there is sufficient credible evidence to warrant a full investigation • A recommendation against proceeding to an investigation is not necessarily the same as a finding of “innocence” • Must state what evidence was reviewed • Summarizes relevant interviews • Includes the conclusions of the Inquiry • The individuals against whom the allegation was made shall be given a copy of the report… [read post]