Search for: "Walter v. Washington*"
Results 321 - 340
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Weisman, Davis, Malm & D'Agostine, P.C., Boston Walter L. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Walter, 969 P.2d 224, 233 n.8 (Colo. 1998). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
[et al.].Washington, D.C. : [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
Cooper and Juliette V. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:45 am
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Dukes v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:04 am
Ed Walters jokes that his practice at Covington & Burling focused on beer and softball. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
John Carey, William V. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:29 pm
Walter J. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm
Walter Dellinger, a former acting solicitor general under President Bill Clinton, made a compelling case for the law’s constitutionality. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:35 pm
" And news releases on American Electric Power v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am
His cases have ranged from the intricacies of intellectual property, such as his defense of music industry copyrights in 2005, to the complexities of the death penalty, such as his pro bono work in Wiggins v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm
- Hackensack, NJ lawyer Jay McDaniel on his New Jersey Business Dissolution Journal Key Trends in eDiscovery for 2011 - David Kaufer of TERIS on the firm's Sophisticated Litigation Support Blog Another Twombly/Iqbal Victory for Plaintiffs: SCOTUS Denies Certiorari for Digital Music Price-Fixing Case - Philadelphia attorney Maxwell Kennerly of The Beasley Firm at his blog, Litigation & Trial Loss Causation - Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v… [read post]
