Search for: "Ware v. Ware"
Results 321 - 340
of 586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm
The defendants suggested that electricity was not a commodity because the Act used terms such as “goods, wares, or merchandise to refer to commodities, and these terms were not commonly applied to electricity. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 10:27 pm
Leary v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Chief District Judge James Ware in San Francisco. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:57 pm
District Judge James Ware of San Francisco, who took over the case of Perry v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:47 am
The Court appointed Ms Ware as a Guardian for the child. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:13 pm
Happily for anyone who wants to free Willie, however, the Supreme Court has cut through that Gordian knot of liability.The Supreme Court held in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
[Cite to Nunes v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:19 am
In the recent Florida case, Spring Lake v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:00 am
The Second Circuit’s decision in Agrawal is puzzling if not downright shocking to those familiar with the Second Circuit’s decision last April in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:12 am
Remember Meyer Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:26 pm
The first of which is Moen Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
Twentieth Century Fox case where the Court explained that “origin of the goods” in the Lanham Act means “the source of wares… [i.e.] the producer of the tangible product sold in the marketplace” (at 31). [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:08 am
Agile Sports Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:02 pm
The court cites to Lee v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 10:08 am
Petrillo v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:59 pm
Huck v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 2:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
In Diamond v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 pm
In this week’s case (ICBC v. [read post]
