Search for: "White v. Workers' Compensation" Results 321 - 340 of 415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:15 am
In McLaughlin v Saga Corporation, 657 NYS2d 784, a case involving an appeal filed with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board [WCB], the Appellate Division initially took the position that a notice of appeal is untimely if it physically received by the appellate body after the Statute of Limitations had passed. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:48 am by admin
 The Ontario Court of Appeal came to the same conclusion in 1997, in White v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
 The Ontario Court of Appeal came to the same conclusion in 1997, in White v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
  RC 4123.90 creates a right of a civil action for an employee who is fired for filing a workers compensation claim. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The crux of Fox will not affect the Longshore and Harbor WorkersCompensation Act community. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The Whiting decision could very well have an effect on workerscompensation practice. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge White) granted the motion: First, the court concluded that the holding of Fitz-Gerald v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am by Charon QC
This includes the compensation we have won for workers suffering from the effects of asbestos diseases an area that is often the subject of biased reporting in the media. ?? [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:40 am by Walter Olson
[Trevor Burrus, HuffPo] Tags: Alex Kozinski, bullying, campaign regulation, emergency medicine, libel slander and defamation, mass tort fraud, nursing homes, NYC, sports, sued if you do, Texas, Twitter, workers' compensation Related posts March 31 roundup (3) Web 2.0 beware: Fair Housing Counsel of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
 To determine whether an internship program exempts an employer from having to compensate an intern in accordance with California's minimum wage coverage (codified in Labor Code § 1171 et seq., IWC Orders 1 through 17), California's Division of Labor Standards Enforcement ("DLSE") abides by the six criteria set forth by the Department of Labor ("DOL"): (1)The internship, even though it includes actual operation of the employer's facilities,… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
 To determine whether an internship program exempts an employer from having to compensate an intern in accordance with California's minimum wage coverage (codified in Labor Code § 1171 et seq., IWC Orders 1 through 17), California's Division of Labor Standards Enforcement ("DLSE") abides by the six criteria set forth by the Department of Labor ("DOL"): (1)The internship, even though it includes actual operation of the employer's facilities,… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
 To determine whether an internship program exempts an employer from having to compensate an intern in accordance with California's minimum wage coverage (codified in Labor Code § 1171 et seq., IWC Orders 1 through 17), California's Division of Labor Standards Enforcement ("DLSE") abides by the six criteria set forth by the Department of Labor ("DOL"): (1)The internship, even though it includes actual operation of the employer's facilities,… [read post]