Search for: "Williams v. Carter" Results 321 - 340 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by axd10
Casenote: The Work Made for Hire Exception to the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (vara): Carter v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Reflecting on the Paris attacks and the wave of Islamic State attacks on global targets, Jen Williams looked at why experts failed to notice the globalization of the group’s strategy. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
In 2001, it was then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist who was sounding the alarm, according to the federal court system's former top administrator. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
William Barr has testified to Congress that, in his capacity as U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Expanding the Internet of Things: Four Key Legal IssuesOctober 2020 By David Verhey Verhey is Partner with Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig in Washington DC office. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm by Ediberto Roman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appointed by Jimmy Carter. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
By expressly reaffirming the EOs issued by Presidents Obama (EO 13,563) and Clinton (EO 12,866), which built on the earlier EOs issued by Presidents Reagan (EO 12,291) and Carter (EO 12,044), President Biden’s EO 14,094 bolsters the bipartisan consensus in favor of both centralized presidential review of regulation (via OIRA), and the use of BCA to compare policy options.[2]  Important steps over time include the creation of OIRA during the Carter… [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Fourth, what is to be made of statements by Attorney General William Barr and U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Reasonable readers must be taught that that the First Amendment allows us the “breathing space” to make such errors (See, New York Times Co. v. [read post]